Why Well-Being Is About More Than Happiness
We all want to live a life filled with well-being. But what does that really mean? Is it happiness? Contentment? Peace? A sense of purpose? Strong relationships? The answer is more complicated that it seems.
For decades, researchers have used terms like well-being, flourishing, quality of life, thriving, and positive mental health to describe a life well lived. The problem is that these terms haven’t always meant the same thing, and different fields have defined well-being in different ways.
Many in positive psychology use the PERMA model developed by Martin E.P. Seligman, Ph.D., to define a flourishing life: Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment.
“There’s no scarcity of well-being models, and there’s a lot of confusing language around the concept of well-being or positive mental health,” says Joep van Agteren, Ph.D., CEO of Be Well Co and an affiliate senior lecturer at the School of Public Health at Adelaide University.
Without a shared understanding of positive mental health, it could be difficult to compare studies, evaluate interventions, and know which aspects of life matter most. A recent study published in Nature Mental Health hopes to solve this problem by creating a framework researchers can use to define what it means to live the good life.
Why Is Well-Being So Difficult to Define?
When it comes to physical health, doctors rely on widely accepted markers, such as blood pressure, cholesterol, heart function, and blood sugar. Positive mental health is different.
While researchers can measure happiness, optimism, resilience, or purpose, the challenge is agreeing on which of those experiences belong in the definition of positive mental health.
“Well-being is a word that sounds quite simple but is actually quite complex and vague,” Joep says. “It means a lot of different things to different people, and because it’s so personal and culture-dependent and influenced by our own experience, it has been difficult to get on the same page.”
One reason for this, Joep says, is that well-being is studied across various fields and disciplines.
“A philosopher, a psychologist, and an economist will look at this notion of well-being very differently and are influenced by completely different traditions,” Joep says. “That makes it difficult to find a universal definition unless researchers intentionally bring those different perspectives together.”
Finding a Common Language
Joep was part of the University of Adelaide research team that sought to develop a taxonomy that would act as a framework everyone can use.
The research team conducted a Delphi consensus study that gathered opinions from more than 120 globally recognized experts from 11 different fields of study, including psychology, psychiatry, public health, medicine, sociology, and economics. During three rounds of surveys, experts rated which qualities were the strongest indicators of positive mental health.
They started with 26 possible dimensions identified through previous research and ultimately narrowed the list down to 19.
Joep says the goal isn’t to introduce another model of well-being, but rather create a foundation that supports the models that already exist.
“We hope people see the taxonomy as a common language and a classification of scientifically supported dimensions of well-being,” he says. “You can see it as a highly diverse foundation that lists the key elements — an ingredient list, if you like — that you can use to inform your own approach to mental well-being.”
The 19 Dimensions of Positive Mental Health
The top six candidates for defining well-being on which more than 90% of experts agreed were:
Meaning and purpose
Life satisfaction
Self-acceptance
Connection
Autonomy
Happiness
The remaining 13 components are acceptance, competence, belonging, engagement, development (personal growth), optimism, self-congruence (living in alignment with one’s values), fun, vitality, activities and functioning, achievement, calmness, and a sense of safety.
It’s important to note that these aren’t necessarily the “keys to happiness,” and the six dimensions with the strongest consensus aren’t necessarily a clear path to a good life. Instead, the taxonomy provides a broader understanding of positive mental health.
“We’re not saying the taxonomy is here to replace models,” Joep says. “It’s here to act as a grounding beneath them.”
Well-Being is More Than Happiness
One of the study’s more interesting findings is that meaning and purpose ranked slightly higher than happiness among the experts. While Joep says that there wasn’t a significant gap, he believes that meaning and purpose can be especially effective because they can be cultivated in many areas of life.
“I like that the taxonomy makes happiness just one of the dimensions to strive for,” he says. “Mental well-being is about so much more than happiness.”
The study also suggests that people living with anxiety, depression, or another mental health condition can still experience purpose, personal growth, autonomy, joy, and strong relationships.
“These things should not be ruled out merely by the presence of symptoms of a mental health condition,” Joep says.
He compares it with physical health: someone with asthma, for example, can still be physically fit.
Where Do We Start?
Although the study wasn’t designed to tell us how to become happier, the taxonomy can give us a blueprint on how to get there.
Rather than asking only, “Am I happy?” consider other areas of your life. Could your relationships be stronger? Do you feel connected to your community? Are you making time for personal growth, purpose, or fun? These are the building blocks for a good life. We don’t have to ace each dimension, but use the list to see which areas we can improve on.
“What the taxonomy shows is that there are about 19 different areas you could focus on,” Joep says. “If you’re struggling with either of those, or multiple of those, it gives you a clear direction to steer your activities.”
While happiness is great, it’s only one piece of the puzzle to defining positive mental health, and the study shows there are many ways to achieve greater well-being. The science is evolving, and researchers like Joep are continuing to explore how these dimensions are related to one another.
Now there is a framework backed by leading experts that can be used to design programs or interventions to improve well-being.
The research has also changed Joep’s own view of the good life. He says he has expanded his definition to place more importance that social relationships.
“My view has now become much more balanced around the need to have a social environment where people feel at ease and supported, while also finding enough downtime and time to have fun,” he says. “For someone who is not the most zesty person has a tendency to work a lot, that’s a pretty important reminder and has helped me a lot myself.
“Who said science couldn’t be therapeutic?”
Read More